"MIDDLEMARCH" AND ME
A hometown friend
who is a respected historian is currently writing a book about a controversial
local figure who went from being our town's most promising scholar to being the
only US physician since the doctor who treated John Wilkes Booth to be arrested
for accessory to murder after the fact. Other parts of his trajectory included
being pursued by the FBI, jail, and lastly, an honored career as a
humanitarian.
What could my small
efforts to help her with her research have to do with my belated reading of
"Middlemarch"?
Some years ago, we found this 1977 edition at a charity book sale. Like its heroine, it was patiently waiting for the right moment. |
MIDDLETOWN,
MEDDLEMARCH, MIDDLEMARCH
Or should the order
be reversed? I'm sticking with the first because I come from Middletown, and
have only now, in my 68th year, come to "Middlemarch." Although the
book was published in 1871 in a country far from mine, the universal
applicability of its observations of small-town life and human nature offer
ample proof that the author of "Middlemarch"
knew what she was about.
The heroine,
Dorothea,(inappropriately nicknamed Dodo?) was not only no dodo, but is more
accurately compared, by the editor of my edition, to "a modern-day Saint
Teresa."
Nevertheless, in the
book's Finale, George Eliot references the town rumor mill's negative view of
the protagonist, who was "spoken of to a younger generation as a fine girl
who married a sickly clergyman, old enough to be her father, and in little more
than a year after his death gave up her estate to marry his cousin – young
enough to have been his son, with no property, and not well born. Those who had
not seen anything of Dorothea usually observed that she could not have been 'a
nice woman,' else she would not have married either the one or the other."
This may be a
stretch, but I am thinking of the way the Middletown grapevine whose reach is
surprisingly long, responded to Alan Berkman's rise, Fall, and rise.
I have not always
had good things to say about my home town, where everyone seemed overly
interested in everyone else's business, and maybe my response was a childish
rush to judgment. A high school friend with whom I resumed contact in the wake
of our class's 50th reunion sees our town quite differently, and his positive
words about it have made me rethink my own.
Be that as it may,
regardless of whatever muddling happens in Middletown, "Middlemarch"
will remain a classic. And I hope that my friend's book about AB will, too.
FLASH: My husband
tells me that according to a recent BBC poll, "Middlemarch" was cited
as the UK's best novel. So in waiting more than six decades to get to it, we
find ourselves both "behind the eight ball" and in front of it for
having just read what some consider Britain's most popular novel. No matter.
When is the right time to read a classic? Any time!
Comments
Post a Comment